The Supreme Court rules that the statement of Neil Aggett is admissible as evidence.

Updated: 30 Sep 2019

Search events by date

What happened on your birthday?

How we know this

01Kalley, J.A.; Schoeman, E. & Andor, L.E. (eds)(1999). Southern African Political History: a chronology of key political events from independence to mid-1997, Westport: Greenwood.

Last updated · 30 Sep 2019

Cite this entry

South African History Online. (2012, June 1). The Supreme Court rules that the statement of Neil Aggett is admissible as evidence.. South African History Online. https://sahistory.org.za/ref/E-0084960

South African History Online (2012) 'The Supreme Court rules that the statement of Neil Aggett is admissible as evidence.', South African History Online, 1 June. Available at: https://sahistory.org.za/ref/E-0084960 (Accessed: 25 July 2026).

South African History Online, The Supreme Court rules that the statement of Neil Aggett is admissible as evidence. [website], https://sahistory.org.za/ref/E-0084960, (accessed 25 July 2026).

"The Supreme Court rules that the statement of Neil Aggett is admissible as evidence.." South African History Online, 1 June 2012, https://sahistory.org.za/ref/E-0084960. Accessed 25 July 2026.

South African History Online. "The Supreme Court rules that the statement of Neil Aggett is admissible as evidence.." South African History Online. June 1, 2012. https://sahistory.org.za/ref/E-0084960.