Pres Mandela’s testimony in SARFU affairs set aside

Updated: 30 Sep 2019

In providing reasons for the decision of the Pretoria High Court to set the investigation of the Browde Commission into South African Rugby Football Union (SARFU) Affairs aside, Justice William de Villiers said that the evidence of President Nelson Mandela was unsatisfactory because he refused to answer certain questions, answered back and used the court for political rhetoric. The President's Office indicated its intention to appeal against the court's decision, while SARFU boss Dr Louis Luyt announced his own independent investigation into allegations of racism, nepotism and corruption within the rugby body.

How we know this

01Wallis, F. (2000). Nuusdagboek: feite en fratse oor 1000 jaar, Kaapstad: Human & Rousseau.
02Southern African Legal Information Institute, "President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v South African Rugby Football Union and Others", from Southern African Legal Information Institute, [Online], available at www.saflii.org.za [Accessed: 08 August 2013]

Last updated · 30 Sep 2019

Cite this entry

South African History Online. (2011, March 16). Pres Mandela’s testimony in SARFU affairs set aside. South African History Online. https://sahistory.org.za/ref/E-0013381

South African History Online (2011) 'Pres Mandela’s testimony in SARFU affairs set aside', South African History Online, 16 March. Available at: https://sahistory.org.za/ref/E-0013381 (Accessed: 13 October 2026).

South African History Online, Pres Mandela’s testimony in SARFU affairs set aside [website], https://sahistory.org.za/ref/E-0013381, (accessed 13 October 2026).

"Pres Mandela’s testimony in SARFU affairs set aside." South African History Online, 16 Mar. 2011, https://sahistory.org.za/ref/E-0013381. Accessed 13 Oct. 2026.

South African History Online. "Pres Mandela’s testimony in SARFU affairs set aside." South African History Online. March 16, 2011. https://sahistory.org.za/ref/E-0013381.